![]() |
University Archives of Virginia Tech |
Virginia Tech
Governance Minutes ArchiveFebruary 2, 1990
Minutes COMMISSION ON FACULTY AFFAIRS February 2, 1990 The meeting was convened in the Newman Library Board Room at 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: L.A. Eng, F. Baumgartner, E.F. Carlisle, D.A. de Wolf, J.C. Duke, Jr., B. Kuster for J. Hasselmann, H.M. Kriz, J.D. McAlister, C.E. Polan, A. Woodson-Robinson, G.R. Thompson (guest). ABSENT: H. Doswald, R. Sorensen. I. AGENDA The agenda was adopted, with some changes in order of business. II. MINUTES The minutes of the January 19, 1990 meeting were approved with minor changes. III. REPORT FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE Dr. G. Rod Thompson, Chair of the Employee Benefits Committee commented on and answered several queries concerning a summary of faculty fringe-benefits (prepared by L. Eng after consultation with Doug Martin). He then addressed himself to a list of written questions posed to him by J.C. Duke, Jr. Among the latter's concerns were: a) the connnection between the rise in rates of health coverage and the mode of administration by Blue Cross/Blue Shield for the University as part of the self-insured State of Virginia. Response: there is no connection; rates go up everywhere. b) Differences in benefits packages for faculty, administration and staff. Response: see Summary of Benefits. c) Information on perquisites. Response: not available. d) Lack of sabbatical leaves at other Virginia peer or other institutions. Response: doesn't know. e) Benefits package at other Virginia or peer institutions. Response: the results of a survey have been received. Some obvious errors in the data have prompted the Benefits Committee to try and verify the data before release. f) Has there been an increase or decrease in faculty/administration benefits? Response: decrease. Dr. Thompson stressed that the major problem lies in the unbridled increases in the cost of health care. He also noted the problems with the impending transfer of the Cost Awareness program into the Key Care program. One of these problems is that Montgomery Regional Hospital might not be a participating health-care institution. He noted that the Benefits Committee will meet next on March 9 at 2:00 PM in the Pamplin Hall Board Room. IV. JANUARY 22 MEMO FROM PROVOST REGARDING TENURE Dr. Carlisle referred simply to the memo, attached to the Agenda, which states that a tenure policy does exist at VPI & SU and that the administration expects to observe it. V. CFA RESOLUTION 1988-89 D This resolution, regarding mainly the introduction of a fixed term for chairs/heads and directors, and inclusion of appropriate wording to that effect in the Faculty Handbook, was accompanied by a January 16 memo from the Provost giving at some length his thoughts on the conditions of appointment and evaluation of these academic leaders. After some discussion, a motion to send the Resolution back to the University Council was approved. Some ex post facto discussion centered around the issue of evaluation, possible limitation of successive terms of appointment, and possible conflicts between deans and faculty regarding appointments of heads/chairs. Dr. Duke raised some points about the difficulties inherent in temporary administrative positions for research faculty and possible inequities in that use of faculty positions. VI. The meeting was adjourned close to 3:00 pm. Respectfully submitted, David A. de Wolf
VT History | Digital Library and Archives | Special Collections | University Archives
Send questions or comments to:
Tamara Kennelly, University Archivist
University Libraries
Virginia Tech
P.O. Box 90001
Blacksburg, VA, 24062-9001URL: http://spec.lib.vt.edu/minutes/cfa/1990/February+2++1990.html
Last modified on: Tuesday, 25-Sep-2001 13:57:16 EDT