![]() |
University Archives of Virginia Tech |
Virginia Tech
Governance Minutes ArchiveSeptember 11, 1992
Commission on Faculty Affairs Minutes September 11, 1992 Present: J. Buffer, F. Carlisle, D. de Wolf, C. McDaniels, R. Martin, M. Murray, M. Norstedt, F. Pierce, S. Ritchey, W. Williams Visitor: C. Morton The meeting was called to order at 1:30 by David de Wolf, the Chair of the Commission. Announcements: Please send e-mail addresses to the Chair as soon as possible. Future meetings will begin at 1:15 P.M. The next meeting will be on September 25 in 400D Burruss. Anticipated items of discussion for the future include: the report of the special task force on the grievance procedure, the possible revision of consulting forms, the pilot project for minority faculty, advertising and search procedures for post-doc positions, and the "exploitation" of research associates. Agenda: the agenda for the meeting was adopted and revised to place new business before old business to accommodate Cornel Morton. Minutes: the minutes of April 24, 1992 were read and approved. New Business: Cornel Morton, assistant to the President and Director of EO/AA discussed the constitution of the EO/AA Committee and requested a change in its membership. In particular, he requested that members appointed by deans be individuals in each college who have some responsibility for personnel matters and awareness of college needs to bring that knowledge to the committee. A lengthy discussion ensued about the desirability of having a handicapped person on the committee. It was moved and seconded to amend the committee's Statement of Purpose, Section C, to include the following sentence to be located between that beginning "The Faculty Senate" and that beginning "One member." "In addition, the Assistant Dean of Students for Minority Services will recommend no less than two handicapped individuals for membership on the committee, one of whom will be appointed." This motion passed unanimously. Further discussion centered on the function of the EO/AA Committee and the appropriateness of the word "aggressive" in section E2 of the Statement of Purpose and whether the President of the University should make all appointments to the Committee. No action was taken on either matter. The Chair requested Cornel Morton to revise the Statement of Purpose in accordance with his own recommendations and the amendment made at the Commission meeting. The Commission will take action on the revised document at its next meeting. Old Business: (1) The revision of the Faculty Handbook was discussed briefly. The Provost said that he will send copies to all new members of the commission and requested the entire Commission to read it carefully and be prepared to discuss it in detail at the next meeting. (2) The new Faculty Review Procedure was briefly discussed. It will be re-considered by the Commission on Faculty Affairs before it is sent to the University Council. (3) The procedures for awarding Emeritus status to retired faculty members was discussed briefly. Adjournment: there being no further business, the Commission adjourned at 2:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Neil L. Shumsky Secretary
VT History | Digital Library and Archives | Special Collections | University Archives
Send questions or comments to:
Tamara Kennelly, University Archivist
University Libraries
Virginia Tech
P.O. Box 90001
Blacksburg, VA, 24062-9001URL: http://spec.lib.vt.edu/minutes/cfa/1992/September+11++1992.html
Last modified on: Tuesday, 25-Sep-2001 13:57:17 EDT