![]() |
University Archives of Virginia Tech |
Virginia Tech
Governance Minutes ArchiveJanuary 27, 1988
Minutes COMMISSION ON RESEARCH January 27, 1988 President's Board Room 3:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: L. J. Arnold, F. M. Asche, J. Cairns, Jr., P. K. Edwards, P. P. Feret, V. R. Fu, W. L. Flowers (for M. R. Geasler), D. B. Hodge, W. G. Huber, D.G.I. Kingston, D. F. McTaggart, J. K. Palmer (for M. D. Pierson), A. W. Steiss, F. W. Stephenson, B. E. LaBerge (for R. A. Teekell), T. E. Bell (for J. F. Wolfe) MEMBERS ABSENT: R. A. Comparin, M. Potts, G. G. Schurig INVITED GUESTS: M. D. Shelton, C. D. Waring 1. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. The College of Arts and Sciences is conducting a planning exercise regarding long-range goals and objectives. b. A recent article in the CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION discussed universities that have been successful in putting together a stra- tegic planning process. c. Interim President Torgersen has called for an overall strategic planning process for the University. The Commission's statement on goals and objectives should fit into that general effort. 2. MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 13, 1988 MEETING The minutes of the January 13, 1988 meeting were approved as distrib- uted. 3. COMMITTEE REPORTS a. COMMITTEE ON CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATIONS Dr. Ford has been provided with a copy of the report. b. RESEARCH SPACE COMMITTEE The $3 million authorization is included in the Governor's budget. Discussions are being held with the Foundation relative to the pro- cedures for accessing the authorized line of credit. The major infrastructure has been installed at the 460 Compound. c. COMPUTING COMMITTEE Further discussions have been initiated with Dr. Heterick regarding a new approach to the allocation of SMARTDOLLARS. It has been sug- gested that the University's computing facilities should be viewed as a total resource, including those facilities assigned to various units in Colleges and Departments. d. PURCHASING COMMITTEE The memo on revisions to purchasing procedures has been distributed to Deans, Directors and Department Heads. The $1,200 level has been raised to $2,000. UVA and VCU have also been granted author- ity to use these new procedures. 4. GOVERNOR'S BUDGET FOR 1988-90 FOR CORE RESEARCH Certain assumptions about staff levels and distribution were included in the base budget for Core Research. A further modification was made in proficiency increases for classified personnel, requiring that a larger portion of the classified salary increases be paid out of non- general funds. Faculty salaries were authorized at 4.96%. Again, this authorization is divided between general and nongeneral funds. Only the general fund portion will be available for distribution, however. The University cannot dictate that the federal government provide additional funds to pay faculty salary increases as part of the Hatch and MacIntire-Stennis programs. One set of economic initiatives was funded: to initiate a strategic planning and analysis process and to provide research on product diver- sification under Agriculture and Forestry Research. General fund sup- port was recommended for two Commonwealth Centers at Virginia Tech. The impact of the Governor's budget on position allocations under 230-01 is significant. The number of positions in the Core Research Program supported by nongeneral funds will have to increase dramat- ically by the end of the biennium. A list of suggested amendments has been prepared by the Research Divi- sion. Out of that list, some number will be endorsed as the Universi- ty's amendments, and appropriate patrons from among members of the General Assembly then will be asked to submit amendment bills by Janu- ary 29th. 5. REVISIONS TO APPENDIX H: RESEARCH AGREEMENTS WITH INDUSTRY It is proposed that this section of the MANUAL OF PROCEDURES be revised to achieve some further flexibility regarding the use of the VT Founda- tion as a depository for private funds in support of certain types of research activities. This is to be considered a "first reading." Fur- ther discussion will be had at the next meeting of the Commission. 6. DEFINITION OF A GIFT If deliverables are expected by the payor, or if benefits are to be de- rived by the payor, then the funding involved cannot be considered a gift. If a research protocol is specified, whether or not a delivera- ble is called for, this award also is not a gift. The Chairman suggested that the last two agenda items be carried over to the next meeting. At that time, there will be an opportunity to talk fur- ther about the other elements in Appendix H. The meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. The next meeting will be February 10, 1988 at 3:30 p.m. in in the President's Board Room.
VT History | Digital Library and Archives | Special Collections | University Archives
Send questions or comments to:
Tamara Kennelly, University Archivist
University Libraries
Virginia Tech
P.O. Box 90001
Blacksburg, VA, 24062-9001URL: http://spec.lib.vt.edu/minutes/cor/1988/January+27++1988.html
Last modified on: Tuesday, 25-Sep-2001 13:57:24 EDT