![]() |
University Archives of Virginia Tech |
Virginia Tech
Governance Minutes ArchiveApril 4, 1994
University Council Minutes, April 4, 1994 Dr. Paul E. Torgersen called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. Present: P. Torgersen, C. Nickerson, F. Carlisle, M. Ridenour, L. Peters, C. Steger, R. Smoot, T. Goodale, J. Lilly (for E. Blythe), G. Russell, L. Swiger, P. Knox (for P. Edwards), B. Paterson (for B. Bates), R. Johnson (for R. Sorensen), W. Worner, E. Henneke, P. Meszaros, J. Eustis, P. Eyre, E. Holford, M. O'Neill, C. Stott, B. Williams (for L. Shumsky), R. Mitchiner, J. Robinson, R. Olin, J. McKenna, E. Brown, G. Holtzman, J. Ficenec, D. De Wolf, G. Brown, W. Greenberg, E. Kornegay, N. Castagnoli, P. Miller, K. Kubin, E. Holford (for N. Dodl), W. Knocke, D. Smith, M. Sporakowski (for V. Fu), L. Richardson, K. Martin, C. Pinder, B. Misra, S. Wheeler, C. Mitchell, T. Schell, B. Rowland, F. Homan, R. Stephenson, and J. Perkins. Guests: P. Hyer, Provost Office; L. Moore, Governance Committee; L. McMahon; Spectrum; T. Settle, Division of Continuing Education; K. Leclaire, SGA; L. Aleutz, Student Budget Board; S. Ginther, SGA, J. Perrelli, SGA, B. Sayre, and S. Tubbs, Tech Independent.. 1. Adoption of Agenda A motion was made and seconded to approve the agenda. The motion passed. 2. Approval of Council Minutes of March 21, 1994 A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of March 21, 1994 with corrections. The motion passed. 3. First Reading, Commission on Faculty Affairs Resolution CFA 93-94E, Revision of the Process for University-Level Review of Proposals for Reduction in Force Associated with Discontinuance or Reorganization of Programs. Dr. Bill Williams presented Commission on Faculty Affairs Resolution CFA 93-94E, Revision of the Process for University- Level Review of Proposals for Reduction in Force Associated with Discontinuance or Reorganization of Programs. Dr. Williams explained that this resolution will replace a portion of the existing policy on "Reduction in Force" which was written and adopted before the Advisory Council on Strategic Budgeting and Planning came into existence. The new resolution clearly defines a method whereby the President consults with the unit in question, requests a mutually acceptable proposal, and presents it to the Advisory Council on Strategic Budgeting and Planning. Finally, the Advisory Council will forward the proposal with its own recommendations to the University Council for action. Once University Council has acted upon the Advisory Council's recommendations, the President will form an ad hoc committee for the purposes of ensuring the rights, privileges, and interests of affected faculty. Concern was expressed among Council members regarding a change in the prescribed membership of the Advisory Council on Strategic Budgeting and Planning. Dr. Williams assured Council that this augmentation would exist only for the expressed purpose of dealing with a reduction in force situation. The augmented membership would not be in effect for matters that this Council normally deals with. Dr. Williams responded to questions regarding commission representation on the augmented council by pointing out that the commissions would be chosen according to their involvement in the reduction in force; relevancy might vary from time to time depending on the situation. In most cases, the Commission on Faculty Affairs, Commission on Staff Affairs, Commission on Graduate Studies and Policies, and the Commission on Undergraduate Studies and Policies would be included. Further discussion will continue on April 18 when Dr. Larry Shumsky presents the resolution for second reading and vote. 4. First Reading, Commission on Public Service and Extension Resolution 1993-941, University Policy on Continuing Education. Dr. Jerald Robinson presented Commission on Public Service and Extension Resolution 1993-941, University Policy on Continuing Education. Dr. Robinson explained that the new resolution would replace the university's continuing education policy which was implemented in 1984. Dr. Robinson pointed out that a new director of Continuing Education arrived in 1992 and at that time an initiative was begun to update the policy and make it administratively and governmentally correct. Dr. Robinson explained that the new resolution was a result of collaborative efforts from college representatives, the Commission on Faculty Affairs, the university attorney, the Provost's Office, and the Virginia Cooperative Extension Service. Further discussion will occur at the upcoming meeting when Dr. Robinson presents the resolution for second reading and vote. 5. First Reading, Commission on Student Affairs Resolution 93-94A, Location of Registered Student Organization (RSO) Accounts. Dr. Jim McKenna presented Commission on Student Affairs Resolution 93-94A, Location of Registered Student Organization (RSO) Accounts. Dr. McKenna explained that this resolution, initiated from graduate and undergraduate associations, asked that not all of the money generated by the students themselves in their own money-raising activities be kept in their own account but that money that comes to them from student activity monies be maintained within the university account. A question was raised on how students were polled (or surveyed) regarding this issue. A representative of the SGA Finance Committee explained the polling process and the subsequent majority vote. At this point, Dr. McKenna asked for a deferral of first reading since the academic year is about to end and the students would like to see this issue resolved before they depart. Dr. Ray Smoot suggested that we not defer first reading so that further discussion could occur regarding procurement and liability implications as well as observance of the Virginia Procurement Act. Therefore, further discussion will be held at the upcoming meeting when Dr. McKenna presents second reading and vote. 6. Second Reading, University Council Resolution 1, Proposing that Membership Lists be Moved from the Body of the Constitution to the By-Laws. Dr. Pat Hyer presented University Council Resolution 1, Proposing that Membership Lists be Moved from the Body of the Constitution to the By-Laws for second reading and vote. Dr. Hyer gave a brief overview of the resolution. The Student Government Association brought forward an amendment stating that proportions of administration, faculty, staff, graduate and undergraduate students be secured in the constitution so that even if the commission/committee structures change, the proportions of representation could not change without an amendment to the constitution. Dr. Hyer explained that there are existing passages in the constitution which guarantee student representation but that proportions of representation might change as colleges reorganize. The SGA amendment failed. After further discussion, a majority affirmative vote of actual Council membership was achieved and the resolution passed. 7. Second Reading, University Council Resolution 2, Proposing a Change to Article VII of the University Council Constitution. Amendment to the resolution: The Commissions on Faculty and Staff Affairs may elect a vice chair if desired; however, the chair positions will be held by the vice presidents of the respective Senates. Dr. Pat Hyer presented University Council Resolution 2, Proposing a Change to Article VII of the University Council Constitution for second reading. Dr. Hyer explained that this resolution provides early election of a commission vice chair so that continuity of leadership can be assured. The vice chair will serve as needed during the year, assuming the role of chair in the following year. A majority affirmative vote of actual Council membership was achieved and the resolution passed. 8. Second Reading, University Council Resolution 3, Proposed Changes to Article IX, Section 2, of the University Council Constitution. Amendment to the resolution: The standing committee chair shall be from among the committee members. The chair shall be appointed by the President, recommended by the host commission with appointment by the President, or elected by the committee, as specified in the By-Laws. Dr. Pat Hyer presented University Council Resolution 3, Proposed Changes to Article IX, Section 2, of the University Council Constitution for second reading. Dr. Hyer explained that this resolution provides a more flexible method of appointing committee membership for standing university committees. Commissions will identify who the members will be, how they will be selected, and how their chairpersons will be elected. The commissions will present their committee structures to University Council in the fall of 1994-95 for a vote, and at that time they will become part of the University Council By-Laws. The Student Graduate Assembly strongly suggests that undergraduate representation continue to be an election process of the SGA and not open to the commissions' determination as to student representation. After further discussion, a majority affirmative vote of actual Council membership was achieved and the resolution passed. 9. Second Reading, Commission on Graduate Studies and Policies Resolution 93-94A, 4000 and 5000 Level Courses. After a brief discussion, the motion passed. Dr. Reginald Mitchiner presented Commission on Graduate Studies and Policies Resolution 93-94A, 4000 and 5000 Level Courses for second reading. Dr. Mitchiner explained that this resolution replaces the current method for undergraduate enrollment in 5000-level courses. The new process allows undergraduate students to enroll as dual enrollees and also permits them to enroll in 5000-level courses within their department, with permission from the course instructor, and with the approval of their department head. They will no longer need permission from the dean of the Graduate School. After two failed amendments and extensive debate, a majority vote was obtained and the resolution passed. 10. In successive motions, and after brief discussions, Council approved the minutes of the following meetings. a. Approval of the minutes of the Commission on Public Service and Extension, September 14, 1993, November 9, 1993, December 14, 1993, and February 8, 1994. b. Approval of the minutes of the Commission on University Support, February 1, 1994. 11. For Information a. Minutes of the Advisory Council on Strategic Budgeting and Planning, February 16, 1994. 12. Announcements Mr. Jake Perkins, Student Government Senator, introduced the newly elected officers: President-elect, Mr. Seth Ginther; and Vice-president elect, Mr. Jon Perrelli. Mr. Carl Mitchell, vice president of the Graduate Student Assembly, introduced Mr. Brian Sayre, Vice-president elect. Council welcomed these new members. 13. Question/Answer Forum A suggestion was made to Dr. Torgersen regarding the university adopting a policy on alcohol abuse. It seems there is a perception that Virginia Tech has compromised on this issue in the past, and that a statement regarding alcohol abuse might be timely. Dr. Torgersen thanked Council for this suggestion and said he would take it under advisement. Dr. Torgersen thanked everyone for the extraordinarily large turnout. The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Nickerson Executive Assistant to the President /bjl
VT History | Digital Library and Archives | Special Collections | University Archives
Send questions or comments to:
Tamara Kennelly, University Archivist
University Libraries
Virginia Tech
P.O. Box 90001
Blacksburg, VA, 24062-9001URL: http://spec.lib.vt.edu/minutes/ucm/1994/April+4++1994.html
Last modified on: Tuesday, 25-Sep-2001 13:57:50 EDT