Back Talk
The American Draft System: Is It
Necessary-Outdated?
 |
 |
|
By: Fredi
Hairston and Larry Billion
|
Source: "Back Talk,"
Virginia Tech, 13 October
1967.
The original text, spelling, and punctuation have been
retained.
Con
The draft, as it exists in America, today, is a futile product
of the past. The need for military power was great when the draft
was established. Manpower was limited. However, the social
structure of America has changed considerably since then. It is no
longer the norm for a young man to conclude his education with high
school. Also, the apex of nationalistic militarism which existed at
that time is not a part of present-day American life.
The major inconsistency in the American system is summed up by
the somewhat tired argument that an eighteen year old boy can die
on a field of battle for his country, yet he does not possess the
right, in most states, to vote, consume alcoholic beverages, or
even marry. The justification for this non-equilibrate state of
affairs has never been expounded upon by the ruling elite. From
this fact it is easy to see why a young man facing military service
might decide that he is not ready to die or to be maimed and
proceed to "dodge the draft." "Why should I give my life so that
another man can enjoy the privileges which I can not possess?" This
is the burning question in the mind of many young men. And it is a
most valid one. What right has this, or any other, government to
say to its citizens, "You are going to fight for another man's
rights, whether or not you have these same rights or not"? If the
government has such an extensive power over the lives of its young
men now, what will be its extent in the future?
I do not, however, endorse the burning of draft cards in protest
to this outdated system. I must explain that this action does
nothing to eliminate the cause of the discontent--the draft itself.
If the draft card burners would channel their energies into the
writing of letters to the power structure of this country, their
chances of success would be greatly increased. To those who are
more aggressively anti-draft than I, I must explain that I also
feel that if letters are of no avail, militant action is the only
recourse open.
"Draft-dodging" is held to be a serious crime when it should
not. Sending a man to prison for refusing to serve in the military
is asinine. Not only does the country not receive the service of
the man as part of the military, but private enterprise and
government agencies other than the military are denied whatever
contributions this individual might make. Of what value is
this?
The only conclusion to draw from the condition of the draft
system is that it must either be abolished or reconstructed. The
day of the existing law has passed, a modern system must be
established for the modern world.
Pro
Draft dodgers and dissenters are definitely acting in a manner
uncalled for, which must be absolved before adverse consequences
result. The United States, in its existing condition of world
involvement, cannot afford to have such internal difficulties. We
must win the war in Vietnam to preserve this countries' world
position and security. Therefore, the draft system is of utmost
need and cannot logically be abolished.
Presently, the United States is actively involved in the Vietnam
conflict. We, the people of America, cannot do anything
CONSTRUCTIVE about this situation until November of 1968. This is
the time that the eligible citizens select the government to
represent them and determine this countries' foreign policy. If
citizens do not support the policy of the United States, this is
the time to reveal this objection. At this time, something
constructive can be accomplished concerning the Vietnam conflict
policy.
Draft dodgers, who burn their draft cards and run to Canada, are
a problem which must be absolved. Certainly, few citizens of this
country are anxious to go to the Vietnam front, serve their country
and possibly lose their life. However, it is each and every capable
males' DUTY to answer a call to military service. One must not
avoid this responsibility to his nation, even if an individual is
anti-draft and anti-Vietnam. The United States desperately needs
these fighting men to combat the spread of the communistic
ideology.
The draft is a useful method for this nation to procure
necessary forces to protect our country. Until a better method can
be established and passed through Congress, the present system must
suffice and remain. Even though certain people may be against the
draft principle, we must all support its use. The defense of the
United States is of primary concern and must be remembered at all
times. It was to maintain the security and defense of this nation
that the draft was first conceived.
At this time, the welfare of America is again being attacked. If
the Vietnam conflict (war?) does not terminate in a favorable
manner, communism will spread throughout the world. Eventually the
United States would be the target. We MUST stop the communistic
advance in Southeast Asia, NOW! The draft can not presently be
removed without causing great harm to this nation. Our military
strength would be diminished to a degree which would alleviate
defeat. We certainly can not afford such a result. This factor
alone, gives sufficient and undeniable support to the draft
system.
Return to: Freddie
Hairston Home Page
|